Discussion about this post

User's avatar
JGM's avatar

Did 30+ in the Met with the handicap of having an IQ of 156. I came to despair of many (not all) of the people who held positions of rank. Illogical, short sighted, stupid decisions littered their careers. To be 'too quick' or 'too clever' in their company was, lets say 'not optimal'. They scrambled to strategic ranks, away from the dangers of tactical decisions and their consequences.

Fortunately, the Met (like the Army) was actually run by sergeants, so the strategic incompetent's buffoonery could be somewhat mitigated. I wouldn't be surprised if those senior officers felt the same way about us, as the Politicians calling us Plod.

Expand full comment
Jez Burkinshaw's avatar

You are correct. I do speak to new officers and remind them that we are the holder of the office of Constable. That means you stand in the middle and favour no-one. We are not on the victim’s side or against the perpetrators. We are neutral. But that means helping everyone. That might be helping to access justice or helping to be dealt with by justice.

So you are correct. Looked upon by suspicion from all sides. And unless you get it, Policing will be a mystery to most.

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts