4 Comments
User's avatar
Jon Martin's avatar

Every word the truth there.

I had a brief stint looking after a District Intelligence Unit

Could have been an amazing tool to terrify the criminals and put away bad people.

Instead an office churning out graphs and tables to be discussed during a relentless meeting cycle.

Simon Neale's avatar

Informative and entertaining. Thanks! Looking at this bit:

"From such humble data, they would build an intelligence picture of local criminality. Then, of course, there was information from informants - which all officers (both uniformed and detective) were expected to cultivate. By the late 1990s, this practice ceased, due to concerns around corruption"

Might it not also be attributable to the fact that by the late 1990s, increasing numbers of criminals were dusky incomers who seemed largely interchangeable and whose criminal history was unknown to anyone in the country?

Dominic Adler's avatar

Foreign National Offenders were / are an issue, but to be honest? Grassing is pretty universal if you know what you're doing. I've worked with people who could find an informant from virtually any race, creed or religion (the groups often considered the most impenetrable and clannish are often surprisingly malleable). The biggest issue with FNOs is ID, DNA / livescan / biometrics mitigates the problem but a lack of documentation is an issue.

Chris James Coakley's avatar

We had the best of it. Great days, proper leaders but then the new breed came in and the hostile takeover took place. Knuckles and Buckles.